Peterson v. Comcast Cable et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 26 . Motion to Dismiss filed by Karly Baraga, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, 7 is GRANTED. Motion to Dismiss filed by Comcast Cable, 16 is GRANTED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 2, 2009. (HAM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ________________________________________________________________________ LANCE W. PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. COMCAST CABLE, et al., Defendants. _______________________________________________________________________ Lance W. Peterson, 1000 Edgerton #711, St. Paul, MN 55130, pro se plaintiff. Julie Boehmke and Gregory Merz, GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT, PA, 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 500, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant Comcast Cable. Perry Wilson, III and Karly Baraga, DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP, 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant Dorsey & Whitney, LLP and Karly Baraga. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Civil No. 09-0885 (JRT/SRN) The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated November 9, 2009 [Docket No. 26]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Dorsey & Whitney, LLP ("Dorsey") and Karly Baraga [Docket No. 7] is GRANTED; the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Comcast Cable ("Comcast") [Docket No. 16] is GRANTED; and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DATED: December 2, 2009 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. s/ John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?