Multifeeder Technology, Inc. v. British Confectionery Company Limited

Filing 44

ORDER re 43 Stipulation filed by Multifeeder Technology, Inc. Third-Party Plainff's claims against Third-Party Defendant Domino AmJet, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Domino Printing Solutions, Inc. is substituted for Domino AmJet, Inc. as the Third-Party Defendant. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on July 6, 2010. (HAM)

Download PDF
Multifeeder Technology, Inc. v. British Confectionery Company Limited Doc. 44 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MULTIFEEDER TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. BRITISH CONFECTIONERY COMPANY LIMITED, Defendant. and MULTIFEEDER TECHNOLOGY, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. DOMINO AMJET, INC., Third-Party Defendant. ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND TO SUBSTITUTE THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT Civil No. 09-1090 (JRT/AJB) Kristin L. Kingsbury and William Christopher Penwell, SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER, P.A., 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1300, Minneapolis, MN 55401, for plaintiff. R. Christopher Sur and Paul B. Civello, MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN & BRAND, LLP, 3300 Wells Fargo Center, 90 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendant British Confectionery Company Limited. Cynthia Moyer and Sarah McLaren, FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA, 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant Domino AmJet, Inc. 19 Dockets.Justia.com This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation to Substitute Proper Third Party Defendant filed by the parties on June 17, 2010 [Docket No. 43]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Third-Party Plainff's claims against Third-Party Defendant Domino AmJet, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Domino Printing Solutions, Inc. is substituted for Domino AmJet, Inc. as the Third-Party Defendant. DATED: July 6, 2010 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. ____s/ John R. Tunheim____ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?