Slavicek v. Commissioner of Social Security et al

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 11] is DENIED.2.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 19] is GRANTED.3.The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 23, 2010. (slf)

Download PDF
Slavicek v. Commissioner of Social Security et al Doc. 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jason Joseph Slavicek, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. In a Report and Recommendation dated December 1, 2010, the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, and that the case be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff objected to the Report and Recommendation. Defendant maintains that it should be adopted. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 24]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 11] is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 19] is GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Civil No. 09-2432 (JNE/FLN) ORDER LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: December 23, 2010 s/ Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge Dockets.Justia

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?