Hatch v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
Filing
80
ORDER that plaintiffs request is GRANTED. The briefing limit for the plaintiffs reply brief shall not exceed 12,500 words total.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on 10/8/10. (jam)
<![CDATA[
Hatch v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
Doc. 80
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA STEWART HATCH, Plaintiff, v. ORDER WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., WALMART STORES, INC., Defendants, Michael Gaarder, PENNINGTON & LIES, PA, Post Office Box 1756, St Cloud, MN, 56302; John Neal, WILLENBRING, DAHL, WOCKEN & ZIMMERMANN, PLLC, Post Office Box 417, Cold Spring, MN 56320 for plaintiff. Jacqueline Kalk, Joseph Weiner, Sarah Gorajski, and Stephanie Sarantopoulos, LITTLER MENDELSON, PC, Eighty South Eight Street, Suite 1300, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendants. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's request for leave to exceed the 12,000 word count limitation in support of their motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docket No. 66]. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff's request is GRANTED. The briefing limit for the plaintiff's reply brief shall not exceed 12,500 words total. Civil No. 09-2714 (JRT/LIB)
DATED: October 8, 2010 at Minneapolis, Minnesota.
_____ s/ John R. Tunheim______ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge
17
Dockets.Justia.com
17
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
