ERA Marine Products, Inc. v. Jet Dock Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion for Discovery. The motion is DENIED as to the request for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery. The motion is GRANTED with respect to the request for an enlargement of time to respond to defendants motion to dismiss. The response shall be filed by January 15, 2010. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 7, 2010. (HAM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ERA MARINE PRODUCTS, INC., Civil No. 09-3050 (JRT/FLN) Plaintiff, v. JET DOCK SYSTEMS, INC, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING MOTION Vytas Rimas, RIMAS LAW FIRM, PLLC, 40 South Seventh Street, Suite 212-190, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for plaintiff. Emeric Dwyer, MANSFIELD, TANICK & COHEN, 1700 U.S. Bank Plaza South, 220 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendants. This matter is before the Court on the motion filed by plaintiff requesting leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery and to extend time to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss. Based on the foregoing, all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff's motion [Docket No. 21] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: 1. The motion is DENIED as to the request for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery. 17 2. The motion is GRANTED with respect to the request for an enlargement of time to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss. The response shall be filed by January 15, 2010. DATED: January 7, 2010 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. ____s/ John R. Tunheim____ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?