Garcia et al v. 3M Company
Filing
73
STIPULATION AND ORDER 58 Selecting ADR Process, Case Referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/20/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2009) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/8/2009.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARTHUR J. GARCIA, RONALD K. BROOKS, BETTY JEAN NORMAN,
R nT1FR wi( vnT n R nRFRT F.T .A NT1FR D
*E-FILED - 10/20/09*
CASE NO. C09-01943 RMW (PVT)
Plaintiff(s),
v.
3M COMPANY,
STIPULATION AND ()XXXXXXX ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant( s).
/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The paries agree to paricipate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
.¡ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must insteadfile a Notice of Need
for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
.¡ Private ADR (please identif process and provider) MEDIATION
MEDIATOR: HUTER R. HUGHES II, ESQ., OF ROGERS & HARDIN LLP
The paries agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of
the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
Daio9/,-/d1 ~~¡Ç
Dated: JYl::lf ~aqf ~~
Attorney for Defendant
.¡ other requested deadline DECEMBER 31, 2009
XXXXXXX (PROPOSED) ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
X¡ Mediation .X
.¡ Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
90 days from the date of
this order.
.¡ other December 31, 2009
IT is SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10/20/09
UNTED STATES
XXXXXXX MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?