Clifton et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.

Filing 13

ORDER Transferring case to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.(Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 12/1/2014. (PJM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 09-3594(DSD/TNL) Dianna Clifton and Ken Clifton, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Defendant. On October 28, 2014, the court requested briefing from the parties regarding whether transfer was appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and, if so, to which district the action should be transferred. The parties concur that the case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The court agrees. Transferring this case will promote the interests of justice and the convenience of the parties. within the District Arizona.1 Plaintiff Ken Clifton resides The majority of Dianna Clifton’s healthcare providers also reside in Arizona. The majority of events giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in Arizona. Indeed, defendant concedes that Arizona has the closest connection to this case. 1 Moreover, neither party argues that a transfer will result Plaintiff Dianna Clifton died on August 10, 2010. Mr. Clifton maintains this action on his own behalf and on behalf of his wife. in prejudice, and the court foresees none. The main effect of a transfer will be to place the parties in a forum that has some connection to the underlying dispute and is more convenient for the parties. As a result, transfer to the District of Arizona is the just outcome. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Dated: December 1, 2014 s/David S. Doty David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?