Murdock v. Ramsey County Community Corrections Department et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs 2 , this action is summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec tion 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); The claims based on federal law that Plaintiff is attempting to bring in his Amended Complaint is Dismissed with Prejudice and the claims based on state of law that Plaintiff is attempting to bring in his Amended Complaint are Dismissed without Prejudict. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/17/10. (KMW)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
ELIAS A. MURDOCK, Civil No. 09-3679 (MJD/JJG) Plaintiff, v. YWCA ST. PAUL, TAMARA BURCH, YWCA MINNEAPOLIS, PATRICIA QUINN, YMCA MINNEAPOLIS, CASSIE ROOD, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, VELMA KORBEL, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, LEE NELSON, RAMSEY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, TIM CAREY, MAUREEN MUNSON, MATT NELSON, JASON RUDOLPH, CAROL BAUMAN, RAMSEY COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, CRIMINAL DIVISION, JOHN GUTHMAN, PROJECT PATHFINDER, JESSICA RUEGGE, TIM PAWLENTY, CITY OF ST. PAUL, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, BARB McMONIGAL, JEFFREY FISCHBACH, CHRISTINE ROZEK, CITY OF ST. PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT: WESTERN DIVISION, CITY OF ST. PAUL DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, LOUISE LANGBERG, CHRIS COLEMAN, CITY OF ST. PAUL CITY COUNCIL, KATHY LANTRY, CITY OF ST. PAUL ATTORNEYS, JOHN PENLAND, STEVEN HENG, ROSA HERNANDEZ, ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, EMILY GURNON, and JASON HOPPIN, Defendants.

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. 2. 3. Plaintiff=s AApplication To Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs,@ (Docket No. 2), is DENIED; This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); The claims based on federal law that Plaintiff is attempting to bring in his Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and The claims based on state law that Plaintiff is attempting to bring in his Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

4.

Dated: June 17, 2010

s/Michael J. Davis MICHAEL J. DAVIS Chief United States District Judge