Denny Hecker's Cadillac-Pontiac-GMC, Inc. et al v. GMAC Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER: the Court will decide the pending motion to dismiss based on the parties' written submissions. A written order is forthcoming. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on June 9, 2010. (HAM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DENNY HECKER'S CADILLACPONTIAC-GMC, INC., WALDEN FLEET GROUP, INC., AND SOUTHVIEW CHEVROLET, CO., Plaintiffs, v. GMAC INC., Defendant. _______________________________________________________________________ William Skolnick and LuAnn Petricka, SKOLNICK & SHIFF, PA, 527 Marquette Avenue South, Suite 2100, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for plaintiffs. Michael Haag, Jared Kemper, and Thomas Lallier, FOLEY & MANSFIELD, PLLP, 250 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1200, Minneapolis, MN 55401, for defendant. This matter was previously before the Court on plaintiffs' Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, filed on March 29, 2010. The Court granted said motion [Docket No. 24] and continued the March 31, 2010 to allow plaintiffs time to locate replacement counsel. The order also indicated that if plaintiffs did not find replacement counsel within 60 days of the order, the Court would decide the pending motion to dismiss based on the written submissions. Plaintiffs have not notified the Court that they have found replacement counsel. Civil No. 10-0068 (JRT/RLE) ORDER Based upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will decide the pending motion to dismiss based on the parties' written submissions. A written order is forthcoming. DATED: June 9, 2010 at Minneapolis, Minnesota _____ s/ John R. Tunheim ______ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?