Damon v. Groteboer et al

Filing 59

ORDER that: 1. The deadline for objections to the September 24, 2010, Report and Recommendation is extended from October 12, 2010, to October 26, 2010; and 2. The deadline for responses to any objections is extended from October 26, 2010, to November 9, 2010.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on 10/8/10. (jam)

Download PDF
Damon v. Groteboer et al Doc. 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ______________________________________________________________________ JEAN FRANCIOS DAMON and JACQUELINE DAMON, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. DANIEL GROTEBOER et al, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________ Kristin Kingsbury and Steven Weintraut, SIEGEL BRILL GREUPNER DUFFY & FOSTER, PA, 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1300, Minneapolis, MN 55401, for plaintiffs. Christopher Renz and David McGee, THOMSEN & NYBECK, PA, 3600 American Boulevard West, Suite 400, Bloomington, MN 5541; Sten-Erik Hoidal and Todd Wind, FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA, 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000, Minneapolis, MN 55431, for defendants. This matter is before the Court on parties' Stipulation [Docket No. 58] for an extension to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court finds that the parties have shown good cause for the requested extension. Based upon parties' request, and upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The deadline for objections to the September 24, 2010, Report and Recommendation is extended from October 12, 2010, to October 26, 2010; and 2. The deadline for responses to any objections is extended from October 26, 2010, to November 9, 2010. Dockets.Justia.com Civil No. 10-0092 (JRT/FLN) DATED: October 8, 2010 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. ____s/ John R. Tunheim ___ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?