Wilson v. Astrue et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 22 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judges Report andRecommendation dated February 11, 2011 22 . Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 11 is GRANTED and the order of the Administrative Law Judge isREVERSED. Commissioners Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is DENIED.Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, thereby granting her benefits. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/16/11. (KMW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA LaDoris Wilson, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER Civil File No. 10418 (MJD/AJB)
Ethel J. Schaen, Schaen Law Office, Counsel for Plaintiff. Thomas A. Krause, Thomas A. Krause, P.C., Counsel for Plaintiff. Lonnie F. Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Defendant. The aboveentitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated February 11, 2011. [Docket No. 22] Defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including all transcripts filed and exhibits submitted to the Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 11, 2011 [Docket No. 22]. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 11] is GRANTED and the order of the Administrative Law Judge is REVERSED. 3. Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 17] is DENIED. 4. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, thereby granting her benefits. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: March 16, 2011
s/Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?