Russell v. Regents of the University of Minnesota

Filing 4

ORDER - The Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions in the R&R (Doc.#3). Accordingly. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Pltf's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Doc.#2) is DENIED; and 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), this action is summarily DISMISSED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on June 28, 2010. (smr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Joshua James Russell, Plaintiff, v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, Defendant. ORDER Civ. No. 10-2146 (PAM/SRN)

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson, dated June 8, 2010. The Court must conduct a de novo review of all portions of a Magistrate Judge's R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); D. Minn. L. R. 72.2(b). No objections have been filed in the time period permitted. Thus, this Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions in the R&R (Docket No. 3). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Docket No. 2) is DENIED; and 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), this action is summarily DISMISSED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 28, 2010

s/Paul A. Magnuson
Paul A. Magnuson United States District Court Judge