Otis v. Berge et al

Filing 72

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 70 . IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Plaintiffs claims against Philip Burkholder are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.2.Defendant Philip Burkholders motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 53] is GRANTED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 23, 2011. (slf)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA William H. Otis, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 10-2155 (JNE/JJK) ORDER Harold A. Berge, Rose M. Berge, Cindy Lou Berge, Philip Burkholder, Steven Corson d/b/a Corson Law Office, and Others Defendants. In a Report and Recommendation dated April 5, 2011, the Honorable Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Defendant Philip Burkholder’s unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Plaintiff objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 70]. On December 23, 2010, the Court dismissed the claims against Harold A. Berge, Rose M. Berge, Cindy Lou Berge, and Steven Corson. With the dismissal of the claims against Philip Burkholder, all that remains is the crossclaim brought by Harold A. Berge, Rose M. Berge, and Cindy Lou Berge against Steven Corson. The crossclaim, which asserts that “[i]f Plaintiff is awarded damages as a result of this action, Defendants Berge are entitled to . . . indemnity and/or contribution from Defendant Steven Corson,” appears to be moot. The Court will dismiss the crossclaim unless, within seven days of this Order, counsel for the Berges shows cause why the Court should not dismiss the claim as moot. 1 Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against Philip Burkholder are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Defendant Philip Burkholder’s motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 53] is GRANTED. Dated: May 23, 2011 s/ Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?