Jackson v. Metropolitan Council HRA Management Association et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34 . 1. The HUD defendants' motion to dismiss [Docket No. 16] is GRANTED. 2. Jackson's motion to dismiss [Docket No. 25] is GRANTED. 3. To the extent Jackson seeks damages from the HUD defendants under either Title VI or Title VIII, those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and to the extent Jackson seeks relief incident to her remaining claims against the HUD defendants, those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. 4. The HUD defendants are dismissed from this litigation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on April 19, 2011. (HAM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Civil 10-2370 (JRT/JJG)

NADIA JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HRA
MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION,
LUCIA CLAUSEN, AND BARBARA
KNOX,
Defendants.

Nadia Jackson, 5849 73rd Avenue North, Apartment 228, Brooklyn Park, MN
55429, pro se plaintiff.
Mary Dobbins, LANDRUM DOBBINS LLC, 7400 Metro Boulevard, Suite
100, Edina, MN 55439, for Defendant Metropolitan Council HRA
Management Association.
Lonnie Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis,
MN 55415, for Defendants Clausen and Knox.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham dated March 18, 2011 [Docket No.
34]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period
permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of
the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

The HUD defendants’ motion to dismiss [Docket No. 16] is GRANTED.

2.

Jackson’s motion to dismiss [Docket No. 25] is GRANTED.

3.

To the extent Jackson seeks damages from the HUD defendants under either
Title VI or Title VIII, those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and to the extent Jackson
seeks relief incident to her remaining claims against the HUD defendants, those
claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim.

4.

The HUD defendants are dismissed from this litigation.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: April 19, 2011
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

___ s/ John R. Tunheim _____
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge