3M Company et al v. Avery Dennison Corporation
Filing
451
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order dated October 10, 2012 374 is AFFIRMED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/29/12. (GRR) CC: Daniel M Flores on 11/29/2012 (MMP).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
3M Company and
3M Innovative Properties Company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
Civil No. 10‐2630 (MJD/FLN)
Avery Dennison Corporation,
Defendant.
___________________________________________________________________
John C. Adkisson, Ann N. Cathcart Chaplin and Geoff D. Biegler, Fish &
Richardson P.C., Kevin H. Rhodes, 3M Innovative Properties Company and M.
Sean Royall, Michael L. Raiff, and Daniel M. Flores, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher,
LLP, Counsel for Plaintiffs.
Kurt J. Niederluecke, Lora M. Friedemann and Laura L. Myers, Fredrikson
& Byron, P.A. and Charles K. Verhoeven, David Bilsker, Christopher E. Stretch,
and James E. Baker, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Counsel for
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s appeal of Magistrate Judge
Franklin Noel’s Order dated October 10, 2012 [Doc. No. 374] granting Plaintiff’s
motion to strike untimely expert opinion. [Doc. No. 348]
The Court must modify or set aside any portion of the Magistrate Judgeʹs
Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C.
1
§ 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); Local Rule 72.2(a). Based on a review of the
record and the submissions of the parties, the Court concludes that the
Magistrate Judgeʹs Order is neither clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order dated October 10, 2012 [Docket
No. 374] is AFFIRMED.
Date: November 29, 2012
s/ Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge, U.S. District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?