Connell v. Bank of America

Filing 37

ORDER. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 18, 2010 34 . 2. Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED. 3. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 12/13/10. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Dominique J. Connell, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Civil File No. 10-3133 (MJD/FLN) Bank of America, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., BAC Home Loans, LP, Defendants. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated November 18, 2010. [Docket No. 34] Plaintiff Connell filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 35] Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including all transcripts filed and exhibits submitted to the Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Additionally, this Court notes that many other courts have dismissed claims similar to Plaintiff's as frivolous. Hennis v. Trustmark Bank, No. 2:10cv20-KS-MTP, 2010 WL 1904860, at *5 (S.D. Miss. May 10, 2010) ("From coast 1 to coast, claims that debts have been paid under the redemption theory by the plaintiffs' issuance of "bills of exchange" have been dismissed as frivolous."). Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 18, 2010 [Docket No. 34]. 2. Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss *Docket No. 3] is GRANTED. 3. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: December 13, 2010 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?