United States of America v. Steinmaus et al
Filing
63
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.The United States Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 41] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.2.Judgment is entered in favor of the United States and against Joseph E. Steinmaus for federal income tax, interest, an d penalties for tax years 1994 to 1998 and 2002 to 2005 in the amount of $410,391.66 plus interest, statutory additions, and accruals from June 13, 2011, until the amount owing is paid.3.The United States has valid and subsisting federal tax lie ns that arose at the time of federal income tax assessments against Joseph E. Steinmaus for tax years 1994 to 1998 and 2002 to 2005, and that attached at the time of assessment to all property and rights to property held by Steinmaus, as well as to a ll of Steinmauss subsequently acquired property and rights to property, including the real property (Property) located at 7279 40th Street North, Oakdale, Minnesota, and described as follows:The East 200 feet of the North 435.60 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4) of the section Seventeen (17). Township Twenty-nine (29) North of Range Twenty-one (21) West.4.The United States is entitled to foreclose its federal tax liens for tax years 1994 to 1998 and 20 02 to 2005 against the Property. The Property will be sold pursuant to further Order of this Court. The United States shall submit a Proposed Order of Sale within sixty days of August 11, 2011. Steinmaus shall cooperate with the United States in its attempts to sell the Property.5.Paragraph 4 of this Order is STAYED for thirty days after August 11, 2011.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 31, 2011. (slf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
United States of America,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil No. 10-3426 (JNE/SER)
ORDER
Joseph E. Steinmaus, Washington
County Auditor-Treasurer, and
Pamela Fontaine,
Defendants.
The United States brought this action to obtain a judgment for unpaid federal tax
liabilities assessed against Joseph E. Steinmaus, to foreclose federal tax liens encumbering real
property in Washington County, Minnesota, and to distribute the proceeds from the foreclosure
sale. The Court heard the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment on August 11, 2011.
For the reasons stated at the motion hearing and summarized below, the Court grants in part and
denies in part the motion.
Evidence submitted by the United States indicates that the Internal Revenue Service
assessed federal income tax, interest, and penalties against Steinmaus for tax years 1994 to 1998
and 2002 to 2005. As of June 13, 2011, Steinmaus owed the following amounts: for 1994,
$12,612.87; for 1995, $31,747.59; for 1996, $69,881.08; for 1997, $145,719.87; for 1998,
$48,136.52; for 2002, $68,242.28;1 for 2003, $16,379.10; for 2004, $4,401.23; and for 2005,
$13,271.12.
Steinmaus does not dispute the amounts of tax assessed against him, but he claims that
the calculation of interest and penalties may be incorrect. The burden of production with regard
to penalties and interest is on the government. 26 U.S.C. § 7491 (2006). For tax years 1994 to
1
The amount for 2002 includes an estimated tax penalty of $518.86.
1
1998 and 2002 to 2005, the United States has met its burden of production with regard to
penalties and interest by submitting Certified Forms 4340 and the Declaration of Deborah Olson.
See United States v. Gerads, 999 F.2d 1255, 1256 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam); Hefti v. IRS, 8
F.3d 1169, 1172 (7th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Berk, 374 B.R. 385, 391-92 (D. Mass.
2007). Steinmaus had ample time during discovery to request information regarding the
computation of interest and penalties. Accordingly, the United States does not need to produce
detailed computations of interest and penalties, or the date of each notice given to a taxpayer, in
order to meet its burden of production with regard to interest or penalties.
Once the government meets its burden of production with regard to interest and penalties,
the taxpayer must come forward with credible evidence to shift the burden of proof to the
government. Higbee v. Comm’r, 116 T.C. 438, 447 (2001); see also Blodgett v. Comm’r, 394
F.3d 1030, 1035 (8th Cir. 2005). Here, Steinmaus has not come forward with evidence sufficient
to shift the burden of proof to the United States.
An issue of fact remains with regard to the 2001 tax year. Steinmaus claims that $7,500
in federal income tax was withheld from his income and reported to the Internal Revenue
Service. He asserts that the Internal Revenue Service failed to include this withholding in its
calculation of his liability for the 2001 tax year. The Court cannot grant summary judgment in
favor of the United States for the 2001 tax year.
In short, Steinmaus is liable for assessments made for federal income tax, interest, and
penalties for tax years 1994 to 1998 and 2002 to 2005 in the amount of $410,391.66, plus
interest, statutory additions, and accruals from June 13, 2011, until the amount owing is paid.
The United States has valid and subsisting federal tax liens that arose at the time of federal
income tax assessments against Steinmaus for tax years 1994 to 1998 and 2002 to 2005, and that
2
attached at the time of assessment to all property and rights to property held by Steinmaus, as
well as to all of Steinmaus’s subsequently acquired property and rights to property, including the
real property (Property) located at 7279 40th Street North, Oakdale, Minnesota, and described as
follows:
The East 200 feet of the North 435.60 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4) of the section Seventeen (17).
Township Twenty-nine (29) North of Range Twenty-one (21) West.
Pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court “may direct
entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims” if “there is no just reason
for delay.” Here, there is no just reason for delay of entry of judgment. See United States v.
Kocher, 468 F.2d 503, 509 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Beninati, 632 F. Supp. 2d 116, 11920 (D. Mass. 2009). The Court directs entry of a final judgment as to assessments for tax years
1994 to 1998 and 2002 to 2005. The Court also directs entry of a final judgment allowing the
United States to foreclose its federal tax liens against the Property for tax years 1994 to 1998 and
2002 to 2005. For thirty days after August 11, 2011, the United States may not foreclose the
liens.
Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated above, IT
IS ORDERED THAT:
1.
The United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 41] is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
2.
Judgment is entered in favor of the United States and against Joseph E.
Steinmaus for federal income tax, interest, and penalties for tax years 1994
to 1998 and 2002 to 2005 in the amount of $410,391.66 plus interest,
statutory additions, and accruals from June 13, 2011, until the amount
owing is paid.
3.
The United States has valid and subsisting federal tax liens that arose at
the time of federal income tax assessments against Joseph E. Steinmaus
for tax years 1994 to 1998 and 2002 to 2005, and that attached at the time
of assessment to all property and rights to property held by Steinmaus, as
3
well as to all of Steinmaus’s subsequently acquired property and rights to
property, including the real property (Property) located at 7279 40th Street
North, Oakdale, Minnesota, and described as follows:
The East 200 feet of the North 435.60 feet of the Northwest
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4) of the
section Seventeen (17). Township Twenty-nine (29) North of
Range Twenty-one (21) West.
4.
The United States is entitled to foreclose its federal tax liens for tax years
1994 to 1998 and 2002 to 2005 against the Property. The Property will be
sold pursuant to further Order of this Court. The United States shall
submit a Proposed Order of Sale within sixty days of August 11, 2011.
Steinmaus shall cooperate with the United States in its attempts to sell the
Property.
5.
Paragraph 4 of this Order is STAYED for thirty days after August 11,
2011.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: August 31, 2011
s/ Joan N. Ericksen
JOAN N. ERICKSEN
United States District Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?