Lawson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO SEVER AND SUGGESTION OF REMAND (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 7/14/11. (ds)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IN RE MEDTRONIC, INC. SPRINT FIDELIS LEADS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This documents relates to: Lawson et al. v. Medtronic, Inc. et al. 10-cv-04841 MDL NO. 08-1905 (RHK/JSM) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ LEAD COUNSEL’S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO SEVER, AND SUGGESTION OF REMAND Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel’s Amended Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10), and based on all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to the Master Settlement Agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a), the claims of Plaintiffs Felton Lawson and Brenda Lawson in the action styled Lawson et al. v. Medtronic, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 10-cv-04841, against Medtronic, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court having expressly determined that there is no just reason for delay for entering judgment as to the dismissed claims, LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY as to those claims. The Court believes that the remaining claims against non-Medtronic Defendant, Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc., should be remanded by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, the transferor court, for further proceedings, and it hereby SUGGESTS the same to the JPML. See JPML R. 10.1(b)(i). Dated: July 14, 2011 s/ Richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?