Paulson v. Astrue
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 . 1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 7], is GRANTED; 2. The case be remanded for reversal and an award of benefits; 3. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 13], is DENIED; 4. This case be dismissed and judgment entered. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 15, 2011. (HAM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
________________________________________________________________________
Civil No. 10-4935 (JRT/JJK)
GORDON D. PAULSON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Defendant.
________________________________________________________________________
Sean Quinn, FALSANI BALMER PETERSON QUINN & BEYER, 306
Superior Street West, Suite 1200, Duluth, MN 55802, for plaintiff.
Lonnie Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis,
MN 55415, for defendant.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, dated November 21,
2011 [Docket No. 15]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in
the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of
the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 7], is GRANTED;
2. The case be remanded for reversal and an award of benefits;
3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 13], is DENIED;
4.
This case be dismissed and judgment entered.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY
Dated: December 15, 2011
at Minneapolis, Minnesota
s/ John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?