United States of America v. Bame et al
Filing
73
ORDER CONTINUING the hearing on 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment to June 29, 2012 at 8:00 a.m., Courtroom 7A, St. Paul; setting briefing on the parties' Motions. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 05/22/12. (kll)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
United States of America,
Plaintiff,
Civ. No. 11-62 (RHK/JJK)
ORDER
v.
Joanna Bame, et al,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court sua sponte.
The United States filed suit against Joanna Bame and the several other Defendants
on January 10, 2011, alleging fraudulent conveyance, money had and received, and
unjust enrichment. On May 9, 2012, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. No. 60), noticing its Motion for a hearing on June 20, 2012. On May 18, 2012, the
United States filed its own Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 66), noticing its
Motion for a hearing on June 29, 2012. The Court believes these dispositive Motions
should not be separately briefed and should be treated as cross-motions and heard
together.
Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS
ORDERED:
1.
The hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, currently
scheduled for June 20, 2012, is CONTINUED to June 29, 2012, at 8:00 a.m. in
Courtroom 7A, Warren E. Burger Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 316 N.
Robert Street, St. Paul, Minnesota;
2.
The following briefing schedule shall apply to the parties’ Motions:
responsive briefs shall be served and filed no later than June 8, 2012. No replies—
whether by memorandum, affidavit, letter, or otherwise—will be permitted absent further
Order of the Court; and
3.
The Parties’ briefs shall conform to the word limitations provided in Local
Rule 7.1(d)—that is, the total number of words in each party’s briefs (combined) shall not
exceed 12,000.
Date: May 22, 2012
s/Richard H. Kyle
RICHARD H. KYLE
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?