United States of America v. Bame et al

Filing 73

ORDER CONTINUING the hearing on 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment to June 29, 2012 at 8:00 a.m., Courtroom 7A, St. Paul; setting briefing on the parties' Motions. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 05/22/12. (kll)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA United States of America, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 11-62 (RHK/JJK) ORDER v. Joanna Bame, et al, Defendants. This matter is before the Court sua sponte. The United States filed suit against Joanna Bame and the several other Defendants on January 10, 2011, alleging fraudulent conveyance, money had and received, and unjust enrichment. On May 9, 2012, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60), noticing its Motion for a hearing on June 20, 2012. On May 18, 2012, the United States filed its own Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 66), noticing its Motion for a hearing on June 29, 2012. The Court believes these dispositive Motions should not be separately briefed and should be treated as cross-motions and heard together. Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, currently scheduled for June 20, 2012, is CONTINUED to June 29, 2012, at 8:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7A, Warren E. Burger Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 316 N. Robert Street, St. Paul, Minnesota; 2. The following briefing schedule shall apply to the parties’ Motions: responsive briefs shall be served and filed no later than June 8, 2012. No replies— whether by memorandum, affidavit, letter, or otherwise—will be permitted absent further Order of the Court; and 3. The Parties’ briefs shall conform to the word limitations provided in Local Rule 7.1(d)—that is, the total number of words in each party’s briefs (combined) shall not exceed 12,000. Date: May 22, 2012 s/Richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?