Stuke v. Leonard, Street and Deinard et al

Filing 43

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. United States Magistrate Judge Rau's March 21, 2011 Order 22 is AFFIRMED. 2. Plaintiff's appeals of that order 35 , 36 , 37 are DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/16/11. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA RICHARD JAMES STUKE, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Civil File No. 11-141 (MJD/SER) LEONARD STREET & DEINARD, JEFFREY A. EHRICH, JOEL E. ABRAHAMSON, and UNION GOSPEL MISSION, Defendants. Richard James Stuke, pro se. Keith S. Moheban, Leonard Street and Deinard, PA, Counsel for Defendants. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Richard James Stuke’s appeal of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau’s Order dated March 21, 2011. Stuke’s opposition to the March 21 Order is mentioned in Docket Nos. 3537. This Court will reverse a magistrate judge’s order on a nondispositive issue if it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); D. 1 Minn. L.R. 72.2(a). The Court has reviewed the submissions and the record in this case and concludes that Magistrate Judge Rau’s March 21, 2011 Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Therefore, the March 21 Order is affirmed. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. United States Magistrate Judge Rau’s March 21, 2011 Order [Docket No. 22] is AFFIRMED. 2. Plaintiff’s appeals of that order [Docket Nos. 35, 36, 37] are DENIED. Dated: May 16, 2011 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?