Avery Dennison Corporation v. 3M Company et al

Filing 24

MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for James E. Baker by Avery Dennison Corporation. (Friedemann, Lora)

Download PDF
Avery Dennison Corporation v. 3M Company et al Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE Case Number: I 1-cv-00284-SRN-JJK Case Title: Avery Dennison Corp. v. 3M, et aL Affidavit of Movant , an active member in good standing of the bar of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, request that this Court admit pro hac vice James E. Baker , an attorney admitted to practice and currently in good standing in the U.S. District Court for (please identify one specific district to which the attorney is admitted) S.D. New York , but not admitted to the bar of this court, who will be counsel for the plaintiff defendant Avery Dennison Corporation in the case listed above. I am aware that the local rules of this court require that an active Minnesota resident, unless the court grants a motion for a non-Minnesota resident to serve as local counsel, who is a member in good standing of the bar of this court participate in the preparation and presentation of the case listed above, and accept service of all papers served. I, Lora M. Friedemann Check one of the following: I am a resident of the State of Minnesota, and agree to participate in the preparation and the presentation of the case above and accept service of all papers served as required by LR 83.5(d) (sign and complete information below). 17:1 I am not a resident of the State of Minnesota and hereby move for permission to act as local counsel under LR 83.5(d). I agree to participate in the preparation and the presentation of the case listed above, and accept service of all papers served as required by LR 83.5(d) should my motion for a non-resident to serve as local counsel be granted by the court (sign and complete information below and attach a completed Motion for Permission for a Non-Resident to Serve as Local Counsel). Signature: /s/ Lora M. Friedemann MN Attorney License #: 259615 Date: 2/18/2011 Affidavit of Proposed Admittee f, James E. Baker , am currently a member in good standing of the U.S. District one specific district to which you are admitted) but am not admitted to the bar of this court. I understand that if this Court grants me admission pro hac vice, the moving attorney identified in this motion must participate in the preparation and presentation of the case listed above, and Court for the (please identify SD. New York , Dockets.Justia.com must accept service of all papers served as required by LR 83.5(d). I further understand that the District of Minnesota is an electronic court and that I consent to service required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 77 by electronic means and I understand that electronic notice will be in lieu of service by mail unless the Court learns that a failure has occurred in which ease service will be effected by mail within 24 hours. Signature: /5/James E. Baker Date: 2/18/2011 Typed Name: James E. Baker Attorney License Number: 41 ° 172 / Law Firm Name: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, ELP Law Firm Address: 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 issued by the State of NY (initials) Main phone: Direct line: E-mail address: ( 212 ) 849-7000 ( 21 2 )84 9- 7114 jamesbaker®quinnemanuel.com Note: This motion shall be converted to PDF and e-filed in CM/ECF - do not e-file instruction page. The Pro Hac Vice admission fee of $100 must be received by the Clerk of Court before the proposed admittee will be included in the roll of admitted attorneys and receive notices generated in the above-entitled action. The fee can be paid with a credit card when e-filing the motion, or a check, payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court, can be mailed or delivered to the Clerk of Court. For questions, please contact the Attorney Admissions Clerk at (651) 848-1122.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?