Avery Dennison Corporation v. 3M Company et al

Filing 8

FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 3M Innovative Properties Company answer now due 12/13/2010; 3M Company answer now due 12/13/2010, filed by Defendants 3M Innovative Properties Company; 3M Company.(Flores, Daniel) [Transferred from California Central on 2/3/2011.]

Avery Dennison Corporation v. 3M Company et al

Doc. 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

M. SEAN ROYALL, pro hac vice pending [e-mail] GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75201-6912 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 214.571.2900 DANIEL S. FLOYD, SBN 123819 [e-mail] SAMUEL G. LIVERSIDGE, SBN 180578 [e-mail] GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071-3197 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 213.229.7520 Attorneys for Defendants 3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN, SBN 170151 [e-mail] DAVID BILSKER, SBN 152383, [e-mail] EMILY O'BRIEN, SBN 240072, [e-mail] QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22 Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4788 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.875.6700 Attorneys for Plaintiff Avery Dennison Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY and 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY, Defendants. CASE NO. CV 10-7931 MRP (RZx) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) Hon. Mariana R. Pfaelzer Complaint served: Oct. 21, 2010 Current response date: Nov. 11, 2010 New response date: Dec. 13, 2010

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Local Rule 8-3, plaintiff AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION ("Plaintiff") and defendants 3M COMPANY and 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY ("Defendants") hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall have to and including December 13, 2010 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in this action. This stipulation does not extend the time for more than a cumulative total of thirty (30) days from the date Defendants' response initially would have been due. Defendants have not previously requested an extension. DATED: November 10, 2010

M. Sean Royall Daniel S. Floyd Samuel G. Liversidge GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By:

/s/ Daniel S. Floyd Daniel S. Floyd

Attorneys for Defendants 3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company

DATED: November 10, 2010

Charles K. Verhoeven David Bilsker Emily O'Brien QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By:

/s/ David Bilsker David Bilsker

Attorneys for Plaintiff Avery Dennison Corporation

2