St. Jude Medical S. C., Inc. v. Tormey

Filing 160

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Magistrate Judge Leung's March 25, 2013 Order is AFFIRMED. 2. Plaintiff's objections 154 are DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/26/13. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ST. JUDE MEDICAL S.C., INC., Plaintiff, v. THOMAS M. TORMEY, JR., ORDER Civil No. 11-327 (MJD/TNL) Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff, TORMEDCO, INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff. Carrie L. Hund, Edward F. Fox, and Peter L. Gregory, Bassford Remele, PA, Counsel for Plaintiff. Dwight G. Rabuse, Erin E. Neils, and Joshua P. Brotemarkle, Rabuse Law Firm, P.A., Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Thomas M. Tormey, Jr. and Counterclaim Plaintiff Tormedco, Inc. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s objections to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung’s March 25, 2013 Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions against Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Thomas M. Tormey and Counterclaim Plaintiff Tormedco, Inc. for failing to comply with a discovery order and for fabricating evidence. [Docket No. 153] The Court has 1 carefully considered the entire record in this matter and concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. This Court will reverse a Magistrate Judge’s order on a nondispositive issue only if that order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(a). This Court has reviewed the submissions and the record in this case and concludes that Magistrate Judge Leung’s March 25, 2013 Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Therefore, the March 25, 2013 Order is affirmed. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Magistrate Judge Leung’s March 25, 2013 Order is AFFIRMED. 2. Plaintiff’s objections [Docket No. 154] are DENIED. Dated: June 26, 2013 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?