American Dairy Queen Corporation v. Blume et al

Filing 314

ORDER Adopting 307 Report and Recommendation, Overruling 308 Objections; Granting 287 Motion to Establish Damages; the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment against Defendant Guy A. Blume and in favor of Plaintiff American Dairy Queen Corporation ; American Dairy Queen Corporations claims against Defendants Blume Investments, LLC and Royal Professional Solutions, LLC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and all of Defendant Blumes remaining outstanding Motions are DENIED AS MOOT. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 08/13/13. (kll)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

American Dairy Queen Corporation,
Plaintiff,

Civil No. 11-358 (RHK/TNL)
ORDER

v.
Guy A. Blume, et al.,
Defendants.

Before the Court is the July 29, 2013 Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung; timely objections have been interposed by
Defendant Guy Blume. The Court has conducted the required de novo review of the
recommendation of Judge Leung, the Objections thereto, and all of the files, records and
proceedings in this matter. That review establishes that the Report and Recommendation
is fully supported by the factual record before Judge Leung and his recommendation is
supported by applicable legal authorities.
Accordingly, and upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS
ORDERED:
1. Defendant Blume’s Objections (Doc. No. 308) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 307) is ADOPTED;
3. American Dairy Queen Corporation’s Motion to Establish Damages (Doc. No.
287) is GRANTED;
4. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment against Defendant Guy A. Blume and
in favor of Plaintiff American Dairy Queen Corporation in the sum of Seventeen
Thousand Thirty-Three Dollars and Seventy Seven Cents ($17,033.77);

5. American Dairy Queen Corporation’s claims against Defendants Blume
Investments, LLC and Royal Professional Solutions, LLC are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE; and
6. All of Defendant Blume’s remaining outstanding Motions are DENIED AS
MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: August 13, 2013
s/Richard H. Kyle
RICHARD H. KYLE
United States District Judge

2