American Dairy Queen Corporation v. Blume et al
Filing
78
ORDER VACATING 76 Order and adopting 63 Report and Recommendation; Overruling 67 Objections; denying 34 Motion; denying without prejudice 37 ; directing Clerk of Court to enter default against Defendants Blume Investments LLC and Royal Professional Solutions, LLC. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 01/12/12. (kll)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
American Dairy Queen Corporation,
Plaintiff,
Civ. No. 11-358 (RHK/TNL)
ORDER
v.
Guy A. Blume, et al.,
Defendants.
The Court having inadvertently directed the entry of judgment in its Order of
January 11, 2012 (Doc. No. 76), IT IS ORDERED that the Order (Doc. No. 76) is
VACATED. It is further ORDERED, based upon the Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge Leung (Doc. No. 63) and all the files, records, and proceedings herein:
1.
Defendants’ Objections (Doc. No. 67) to the Report and Recommendation
are OVERRULED;
2.
The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety;
3.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Lack of Subject
Matter, Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and Dismiss Case as Frivolous Lack of
Standing (Doc. No. 34) is DENIED;
4.
Defendants’ Motion to Strike Answers (Doc. No. 37) is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
5.
Pursuant to the Order to Show Cause (Doc. No. 48), the Clerk of the Court is
DIRECTED to ENTER DEFAULT against Defendants Blume Investments, LLC and
Royal Professional Solutions, LLC, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a).
Dated: January 12, 2012
s/Richard H. Kyle
RICHARD H. KYLE
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?