American Dairy Queen Corporation v. Blume et al

Filing 78

ORDER VACATING 76 Order and adopting 63 Report and Recommendation; Overruling 67 Objections; denying 34 Motion; denying without prejudice 37 ; directing Clerk of Court to enter default against Defendants Blume Investments LLC and Royal Professional Solutions, LLC. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 01/12/12. (kll)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA American Dairy Queen Corporation, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 11-358 (RHK/TNL) ORDER v. Guy A. Blume, et al., Defendants. The Court having inadvertently directed the entry of judgment in its Order of January 11, 2012 (Doc. No. 76), IT IS ORDERED that the Order (Doc. No. 76) is VACATED. It is further ORDERED, based upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leung (Doc. No. 63) and all the files, records, and proceedings herein: 1. Defendants’ Objections (Doc. No. 67) to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety; 3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter, Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and Dismiss Case as Frivolous Lack of Standing (Doc. No. 34) is DENIED; 4. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Answers (Doc. No. 37) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 5. Pursuant to the Order to Show Cause (Doc. No. 48), the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to ENTER DEFAULT against Defendants Blume Investments, LLC and Royal Professional Solutions, LLC, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). Dated: January 12, 2012 s/Richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?