United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beckman et al

Filing 549

ORDER granting 541 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/1/15. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 09-cv-3332 (MJD/FLN) Case No. 09-cv-3333 (MJD/FLN) Case No. 11-cv-574 (MJD/FLN) TREVOR COOK et al., Defendants, R.J. ZAYED, Receiver. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. TREVOR G. COOK, et al., Defendants, R.J. ZAYED, Receiver. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JASON BO-ALAN BECKMAN, et al., Defendants, R.J. ZAYED, Receiver. This matter is before the Court pursuant to the motions of Receiver Tara C. Norgard (the “Receiver”) (Docket Nos. 1162, 1230 and 541) for an order directing the Receiver to make payments for fees incurred by the Receiver in the Associated Bank action, in or about March, April, and May 2015, for services necessary to assist the Receiver in her duties: 1. Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh, Lindquist & Schuman, P.A. Based on the pleadings, files, and records herein, including the Court’s in camera review of the detailed invoices, and being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Receiver’s Motion is GRANTED. The Receiver is authorized to make payments out of the assets of the Receivership as follows: 1. Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh, Lindquist & Schuman, P.A. (“Carlson Caspers”) March 2015 Legal fees ....................................$12,777.00 April 2015 Legal fees ....................................$ 7,963.00 May 2015 Legal fees ...................................$10,565.00 TOTAL .............................................................. $31,305.00 Dated: July 1, 2015 s/ Michael J. Davis MICHAEL J. DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?