Zard v. Groupon, Inc.

Filing 7

ORDER: Groupon, Inc.'s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended until (i) 45 days after the filing of a Consolidated Amended Complaint or whatever other deadline is set by the transferee court, in the event the JPML grants the MDL Motion, or (ii) 45 days after service of the JPML's decision on the MDL Motion to consolidate or whatever deadline is set by this Court, in the event the JPML denies the MDL Motion to consolidate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 4/6/11. (akl)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Brian Zard, on behalf of himself
and other individuals similarly situated,

Civil Action No.:11-cv-00605 PAM/FLN

Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
Groupon, Inc., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.

The Court hereby approves the Stipulation to Extend Time [Docket No. 6] filed on
behalf of the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED that:
1. Groupon, Inc.’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be
extended until (i) 45 days after the filing of a Consolidated Amended Complaint or
whatever other deadline is set by the transferee court, in the event the JPML grants the
MDL Motion, or (ii) 45 days after service of the JPML’s decision on the MDL Motion to
consolidate or whatever deadline is set by this Court, in the event the JPML denies the
MDL Motion to consolidate.

Date: April 6, 2011

s/ Franklin L. Noel
The Honorable Franklin L. Noel
United States District Court Magistrate Judge