Garcia v. Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. et al
Filing
22
ORDER amending the dispositive briefing schedule re 21 Stipulation. There will be no further changes to the Scheduling Order. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 07/19/12. (kll)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Andrea Santolalla Garcia,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
Civil No. 11-1639 (RHK/SER)
vs.
Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc.,
Hennepin County Medical Center and
Giovanni T. Caponi,
Defendants.
On July 12, 2012, Plaintiff Andrea Garcia and Defendants Hennepin Healthcare System,
Inc., Hennepin County Medical Center and Giovanni T. Caponi, through their respective
counsel, filed a Stipulation (Doc. No. 21) to amend the briefing schedule for filing dispositive
motions as referenced in the scheduling order, dated January 10, 2012. The court, having
reviewed the Stipulation hereby orders the following dispositive briefing schedule.
•
The moving party will file the Notice of Motion, proposed order, any affidavits
and exhibits, and memorandum of law twenty-three (23) days before the
scheduled hearing. For the currently scheduled hearing date of August 30, 2012,
the moving party with file the above-noted documents on or before August 7,
2012.
•
The responding party will file the memorandum of law, any corresponding
exhibits, and affidavit nine (9) days before the scheduled hearing. For the
currently scheduled hearing date of August 30, 2012, the moving party with file
the above-noted documents on or before August 21, 2012.
•
If needed, the moving party may file a reply memorandum no later than five (5)
days prior to the scheduled hearing. For the currently scheduled hearing date of
August 30, 2012, the moving party will file all of the above-noted documents on
or before August 24, 2012.
•
In all other respects, the scheduling order remains the same.
There will be no further changes to the Scheduling Order.
Dated: July 19, 2012
s/Richard H. Kyle
RICHARD H. KYLE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?