Olson v. M.G.M. Wine & Spirits, Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER STAYING CASE(Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 10/16/2012. (PJM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 11-1949(DSD/SER) Kristine Olson on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER v. FTL Corporation d/b/a MGM Liquor and ATM Network, Defendants. This matter is before the court sua sponte. Currently pending in the instant action is the motion for class certification by plaintiff Kristine Olson and the motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction by defendant ATM Network, Inc. (ATM Network). In its motion to dismiss, ATM Network argues that Olson has suffered no injury in fact,1 and therefore does not have standing to bring her claim under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693 et seq. before the Eighth Circuit. This question is currently pending See Charvat v. First Nat’l Bank of Wahoo, No. 8:12-cv-97 (D. Neb. July 12, 2012), appeal docketed, No. 12-2797 (8th Cir. July 27, 2012). Because the outcome in Charvat may control the court’s decision here, all proceedings in this matter are stayed pending 1 In the complaint, Olson sought both actual and statutory damages. Am. Compl. 7. Olson has since abandoned her claim of actual damages. Pl.’s Mem. Supp. 2 n.1. the ruling in Charvat. In light of the stay, the pending motions are dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, based on the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. All further proceedings in this matter are stayed pending the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Charvat v. First National Bank of Wahoo, No. 12-2797 (8th Cir. appeal docketed July 27, 2012). 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification [ECF No. 11] is denied without prejudice. 3. Defendant ATM Network, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [ECF No. 40] is denied without prejudice. Dated: October 16, 2012 s/David S. Doty David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?