Weddle et al v. Apex Financial Management, LLC et al

Filing 11

ORDER that the parties shall have until October 24, 2011, to informally resolve the attorney fee issue; and shall promptly notify the Court if they are able to do so; setting briefing schedule if fee issue is not informally resolved. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 09/23/11. (kll)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Scott and Patti Weddle, Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 11-2122 (RHK/JSM) ORDER v. Apex Financial Management, LLC, et al., Defendants. Plaintiffs in this action have accepted Defendants’ Offer of Judgment, reserving the right to petition the Court for an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs request that the Court issue a scheduling Order affording the parties “a minimum of 30 days . . . to attempt to informally settle th[e] issue of attorney’s fees and costs, without the necessity of the Court’s involvement.” (Doc. No. 9 at 2.) Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties shall have until October 24, 2011, to informally resolve the fee issue. They shall promptly notify the Court if they are able to do so; 2. In the event the parties are unable to resolve the fee issue without the Court’s intervention, the following briefing schedule shall apply to Plaintiffs’ fee request: Plaintiffs shall serve and file a Memorandum in support of their request, together with all supporting documents, on or before October 28, 2011, and Defendants shall serve and file a Memorandum in opposition to the request, together with all supporting documents, on or before November 7, 2011; and 3. No hearing will be held on the fee request unless the Court orders otherwise. Dated: September 23, 2011 s/Richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?