Barber v. Marrinan et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 . 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, [Docket No. 2], is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel, [Docket No. 3], is DENIED; 3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 4, 2011. (HAM) cc: Myron Barber (lmb).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
________________________________________________________________________
Civil No. 11-2279 (JRT/AJB)

MYRON BARBER,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

MARGARET MARRINAN, DAVID
MILLER, NICOLE KUBISKA, AND
THE CITY OF MINNESOTA,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
Myron Barber, 700 North Fifth Street, Belleville, IL 62220, pro se plaintiff.

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan, dated September 8,
2011 [Docket No. 5]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in
the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of
the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, [Docket No. 2], is DENIED;
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel, [Docket No. 3], is DENIED;
3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated: October 4, 2011
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/ John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge