Hays v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 . Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 11 is GRANTED as to Counts 5 (as to CitiMortgage), 7, and 9, and DENIED as to Counts 1, 3, and 6 (as to CitiMortgage) as more fully described above. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on April 17, 2012. (HAM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ________________________________________________________________________ DEBORAH HAYS, Civil No. 11-2477 (JRT/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CITIMORTGAGE, INC. AND SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, LLC, Defendants. _______________________________________________________________________ Gary Hazelton and Nathan Cariveau, HAZELTON LAW FIRM PLLC, Post Office Box 1248, Bemidji, MN 56619; Carlin Phillips, PHILLIPS & GARCIA PC, 13 Ventura Drive, North Dartmouth, MA 02747, for plaintiff. David Orenstein and Kendall Bader, BARNES & THORNBURG LLP, 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 2800, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant Citimortgage, Inc. Theodore Waldeck, WALDECK & LIND, PA, 121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1400, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant Safeguard Properties, LLC. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated March 29, 2012 [Docket No. 32]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 11] is GRANTED as to Counts 5 (as to CitiMortgage), 7, and 9, and DENIED as to Counts 1, 3, and 6 (as to CitiMortgage) as more fully described above. DATED: April 17, 2012 at Minneapolis, Minnesota ___ s/John R. Tunheim _____ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?