Jama v. Minnesota, State of

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Denying as moot 2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in District Court filed by Abdirisak Dahir Jama; Adopting 4 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 11/21/2011. (PJM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Civil No. 11-2596(DSD/SER)
Abdirisak Dahir Jama,
Petitioner,
ORDER

v.
State of Minnesota,
Respondent.

This

matter

is

before

the

court

upon

the

objection by

petitioner Abdirisak Dahir Jama to the September 19, 2011, report
and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau.

In his

report, the magistrate judge recommends that Jama’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied and that this
action

be

§ 2244(d).

dismissed

with

prejudice,

pursuant

to

28

U.S.C.

Jama objects for reasons not responsive to the report

and recommendation.
The

court

reviews

the

magistrate judge de novo.

report

and

file

and

recommendation

the

After a thorough review of

record,

the

court

finds

that

of

magistrate

judge

is

the

of

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72(b)(3); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b).
the

recommendation

correctly disposes of the petition.

the

well

report

and

reasoned

and

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:
1.

Petitioner’s objection [ECF No. 5] to the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation is overruled;

2.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No.

4] is adopted in its entirety;
3.

Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus

[ECF. No. 1] is denied;
4.

Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis

[ECF. No. 2] is denied as moot;
5.

This action is summarily dismissed with prejudice; and

6.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the court denies a

certificate of appealability.
LET JUDGEMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY
Dated:

November 21, 2011
s/David S. Doty
David S. Doty, Judge
United States District Court

2