Winters v. Fisher
Filing
16
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated October 26, 2011 8 . 2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. 3. This action is summarily DISMISSED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/10/12. (GRR) (cc: Louis Boy Winters) Modified on 1/10/2012 (akl).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
LOUIS “BOY” WINTERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
Civil File No. 11-2625 (MJD/SER)
SCOTT FISCHER,
Defendant.
Louis “Boy” Winters, pro se.
Erika R. Mozangue, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Defendant.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated October
26, 2011. Plaintiff Louis “Boy” Winters filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the
record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the
Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Rau dated October 26, 2011.
1
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated October 26, 2011 [Docket No. 8].
2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [Docket No.
2] is DENIED.
3. This action is summarily DISMISSED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 10, 2012
s/ Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?