Winters v. Fisher

Filing 16

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated October 26, 2011 8 . 2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. 3. This action is summarily DISMISSED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/10/12. (GRR) (cc: Louis Boy Winters) Modified on 1/10/2012 (akl).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA LOUIS “BOY” WINTERS, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Civil File No. 11-2625 (MJD/SER) SCOTT FISCHER, Defendant. Louis “Boy” Winters, pro se. Erika R. Mozangue, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Defendant. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated October 26, 2011. Plaintiff Louis “Boy” Winters filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rau dated October 26, 2011. 1 Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated October 26, 2011 [Docket No. 8]. 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [Docket No. 2] is DENIED. 3. This action is summarily DISMISSED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 10, 2012 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?