Psick et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
26
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron filed July 23, 2012 23 . 2. Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint 9 is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. Wells Fargo's Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/4/12. (GRR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
BENEDICT LEROY PSICK, JR., and
ANTONIO GONZALES MORENO, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
Civil File No. 11-3101 (MJD/JSM)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
Timothy L. Thompson, Housing Preservation Project, Counsel for Plaintiffs.
Ellen B Silverman, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and Stacie C. Knight and T.
Thomas Cottingham, III, Winston & Strawn LLP, Counsel for Defendant.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron filed July
23, 2012. Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the
record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the
Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Mayeron filed July 23, 2012.
1
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron filed July 23, 2012 [Docket No. 23].
2. Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint [Docket
No. 9] is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
3. Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order
is GRANTED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: September 4, 2012
s/ Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?