Psick et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 26

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron filed July 23, 2012 23 . 2. Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint 9 is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. Wells Fargo's Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/4/12. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA BENEDICT LEROY PSICK, JR., and ANTONIO GONZALES MORENO, JR., Plaintiffs, v. ORDER Civil File No. 11-3101 (MJD/JSM) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. Timothy L. Thompson, Housing Preservation Project, Counsel for Plaintiffs. Ellen B Silverman, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and Stacie C. Knight and T. Thomas Cottingham, III, Winston & Strawn LLP, Counsel for Defendant. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron filed July 23, 2012. Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mayeron filed July 23, 2012. 1 Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron filed July 23, 2012 [Docket No. 23]. 2. Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint [Docket No. 9] is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: September 4, 2012 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?