Alvarez et al v. Diversified Maintenance Systems, LLC et al

Filing 118

ORDER : 1. The settlement and plan of distribution set forth in the Parties' Stipulation of Settlement [Doc. No. 109] is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and is approved and GRANTED. 2. The Plaintiffs' and Plaintiffs' Counsel's Application for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses [Doc. No. 113] is approved and GRANTED. 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 6/6/13. (LPH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Marco L. Alvarez, et al.

Case No. 11-CV-3106 (SRN/TNL)

Plaintiffs,
ORDER

v.
Diversified Maintenance Systems, LLC,
et al.,
Defendant.

Paul J. Lukas, Nichols Kaster, Timothy C. Selander, and Adam W. Hansen, PLLP, 80
South Eighth Street, Suite 4600, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; Margaret O’Sullivan
Kane, Kane Education Law, LLC, 1032 Grand Avenue, Suite 202, St. Paul, Minnesota
55105; Michael B. Healey, Michael Healy Law, LLC, 1654 Grand Avenue, Suite 200, St.
Paul, Minnesota 55105; and David H. Redden and Nicholas G. B. May, Fabian, May &
Anderson, PLLP, 825 Nicollet Mall, Suite 1625, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, for
Plaintiffs
Ashlee M. Bekish, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, 90 South Seventh
Street, Suite 3800, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; Patrick F. Hulla, Ogletree, Deakins,
Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, 4520 Main Street, Suite 400, Kansas City, Missouri 64111;
and Phillip B. Russell, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, 100 North Tampa
Street, Suite 3600, Tampa, Florida 33602, for Defendant

WHEREAS, on June 6, 2013 at 11:00 a.m., a hearing was held before the
Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge, to consider the Parties’
Joint Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement [Doc. No. 109]; and to consider the
Plaintiffs’ and Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s Application for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Expenses
[Doc. No. 113]; and

1

WHEREAS, having heard the statements of counsel for the parties and reviewed
all material submitted by the same,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.

The settlement and plan of distribution set forth in the Parties’ Stipulation

of Settlement [Doc. No. 109] is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and is approved and
GRANTED.
2.

The Plaintiffs’ and Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s Application for Attorneys’ Fees,

Costs, and Expenses [Doc. No. 113] is approved and GRANTED.
3.

This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

4.

The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: June 6, 2013

BY THE COURT:

s/Susan Richard Nelson
Susan Richard Nelson
United States District Judge

2