American Family Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Graham et al

Filing 115

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1.Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Prevent Donald Gorowsky from Testifying Outside the Scope of His Report 74 is DISMISSED AS MOOT because Defendants do not intend to offer Gorowsky's testimony beyond the sco pe of his report.2.Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Contesting the Enforceability of American Family's Agreement with Steven Graham 77 is DENIED. 3.Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Refe rencing Dismissed Claims 80 is DISMISSED AS MOOT because Defendants do not intend to reference any dismissed claims.4.Defendants' and Counterclaimants' Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence and References to Defendants' American F amily Client Files 82 is DENIED.5.Plaintiffs' oral motion made in open court on October 4, 2013 to preclude Defendants from referencing the case of Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, No. 13-cv-607 (DMN/SER), currently pending before the Court is DISMISSED AS MOOT because Defendants do not intend to reference the aforementioned case.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/4/13. (GRR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY,
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
and AMERICAN STANDARD
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Wisconsin corporations,
Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER
Civil File No. 12-53 (MJD/SER)

STEVEN G. GRAHAM,
a Minnesota resident, and
STEVEN GRAHAM AGENCY, INC.
a Minnesota corporation,
Defendants and Counterclaimants.
Martin S. Chester, Justin P. Krypel, and Colton D. Long, Faegre Baker Daniels
LLP, Counsel for Plaintiffs.
Geoffrey P. Jarpe, Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand LLP, Counsel for
Defendants and Counterclaimants.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ motions in limine.
In accordance with the Court’s oral rulings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine to Prevent Donald Gorowsky from
Testifying Outside the Scope of His Report [Docket No. 74] is
DISMISSED AS MOOT because Defendants do not intend to
offer Gorowsky’s testimony beyond the scope of his report.
2. Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants from
Contesting the Enforceability of American Family’s Agreement
with Steven Graham [Docket No. 77] is DENIED.
3. Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants from
Referencing Dismissed Claims [Docket No. 80] is DISMISSED
AS MOOT because Defendants do not intend to reference any
dismissed claims.
4. Defendants’ and Counterclaimants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude
All Evidence and References to Defendants’ American Family
Client Files [Docket No. 82] is DENIED.
5. Plaintiffs’ oral motion made in open court on October 4, 2013 to
preclude Defendants from referencing the case of Nelson v.
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, No. 13-cv-607
(DMN/SER), currently pending before the Court is DISMISSED
AS MOOT because Defendants do not intend to reference the
aforementioned case.

Dated: October 4, 2013

s/ Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court

2