Newman v. Jansen et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Judge Jay M. Quam be summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 15, 2012. (HAM) CC: Newman on 3/16/2012 (MMP).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
________________________________________________________________________
ANDREW ROBERT NEWMAN,

Civil No. 12-0184 (JRT/LIB)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

MARGRET JANSEN, JUDGE JAY M.
QUAM, COMMUNITY ADDICTION
RECOVERY ENTERPRISE, AND
CARLENE CLOUD,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Robert Newman, 1174 Western Avenue, Fergus Falls, MN 56537, pro
se plaintiff.

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated February 22, 2012
[Docket No. 6]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the
time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the
files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendant Judge Jay M. Quam be summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(iii).
Dated: March 15, 2012
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge