McGurty v. Hiebert et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 . 1. McGurty's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 2 be DENIED; and 2. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on June 13, 2012. (HAM) (cc: Brian McGurty) Modified on 6/14/2012 (jz).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
________________________________________________________________________
BRIAN MCGURTY,

Civil No. 12-0892 (JRT/SER)
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

STEVEN HIEBERT, JOHN DOE, MR.
LANGER, MR. GREY, CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, RYAN M. ZIPF, AND
JOHN B. VAN DE NORTH, JR.,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
Brian McGurty, Post Office Box 130593, Roseville, MN 55113, pro se
plaintiff.

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, dated May 24, 2012
[Docket No. 5]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the
time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the
files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. McGurty’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 2] be
DENIED; and
2. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
' 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: June 13, 2012
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge