Johnson et al v. Dayton et al

Filing 13

ORDER denying 3 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in District Court and adopting 10 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation 10 are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is DENIED; 3. This action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915A(b)(1); 4. Plaintiff is required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, namely the full $350, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. s ection 1915(b)(2); and 5. The dismissal of this action shall be counted as a "strike" against Plaintiff for purposes of 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on July 20, 2012. (clg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

KEVIN MICHAEL HAUSFELD USELMAN,
Civil No. 12-1168 (PJS/JJG)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ON REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

MARK DAYTON, and MARK RITCHIE,
Defendants.

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed
to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all
the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

The Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED;

2.

Plaintiff=s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. No. 3), is
DENIED;

3

This action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A(b)(1);

4.

Plaintiff is required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, namely
the full $350, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(b)(2); and

5.

The dismissal of this action shall be counted as a Astrike@ against Plaintiff for
purposes of 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g).

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: 07/20/12

s/Patrick J. Schiltz
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ
United States District Judge