Mashak v. Residential Credit Solutions, Corp et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 25 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). 1. The Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED; 2.Plaintiff Donald Mashak's Motion to Dismiss 19 is construed as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal u nder Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) and therefore GRANTEDSigned by; 3. Defendant Federal Reserve Bank Systems Motion to Dismiss 11 is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4.This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/14/13. (KMW) CC: Mashak. (kt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Donald Mashak, Plaintiff, v. Residential Credit Solutions Corp.; Provident Bank, NA; Federal Reserve Bank System; Franklin First Financial Corp., John and Jane Doe, Mortgage Broker; John and Jane Doe, Property Appraiser; John and Jane Doe, Brokers; and John and Jane Does;, Civil No. 12-1333 (MJD/JJG) ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff Donald Mashak’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19) is construed as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) and therefore GRANTED; 3. Defendant Federal Reserve Bank System’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: February 14, 2013 s/Michael J. Davis MICHAEL J. DAVIS Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?