Wickner v. Bender et al

Filing 54

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Defendants Robert Bender, Thomas Cherro, Jeff Laine, Kevin Dreher, Jason Furey, and Tyler Rosen's objections (Doc. No. 52 ) to Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel's July 19, 2018 Report and Recom mendation are OVERRULED. Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel's July 19, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 49 ) is ADOPTED. Defendants Robert Bender, Thomas Cherro, Jeff Laine, Kevin Dreher, Jason Furey, and Tyler Rosens motion to dismiss Plaintiff Lance Wickner's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 40 ) is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/11/2018. (las)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Lance Wickner, Civil No. 12-1452 (DWF/HB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Robert Bender, Thomas Cherro, Jeff Laine, Kevin Dreher, Jason Furey, and Tyler Rosen, Defendants. This matter is before the Court upon Defendants Robert Bender, Thomas Cherro, Jeff Laine, Kevin Dreher, Jason Furey, and Tyler Rosen’s (“Defendants”) objections (Doc. No. 52) to Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel’s July 19, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 49) insofar as it recommends that Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff Lance Wickner’s Amended Complaint be denied. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference for purposes of Defendants’ objections. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge determined, taking Plaintiff’s allegations as true and affording all inferences in his favor, that he has alleged enough plausible facts to state claims for excessive force and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, and further that Defendants failed to meet their burden to show that they are entitled to qualified immunity. Finally, the Magistrate Judge concluded that Plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to proceed with a claim for punitive damages. Defendants object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, arguing that Plaintiff fails to state claims for excessive force or deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. Moreover, Defendants argue that even if Plaintiff states valid claims, Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity and that Plaintiff’s punitive damages claim should be dismissed. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including a review of the arguments and submissions of counsel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.2(b). After this review, the Court finds no reason that would warrant a departure from the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. The Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that Plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded claims for excessive force and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. Moreover, Defendants failed to establish at this stage of the litigation that they are entitled to qualified immunity or that Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages cannot proceed. Based upon the de novo review of the record and all of the arguments and submissions of the parties and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, the Court hereby enters the following: ORDER 1. Defendants Robert Bender, Thomas Cherro, Jeff Laine, Kevin Dreher, Jason Furey, and Tyler Rosen’s objections (Doc. No. [52]) to Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel’s July 19, 2018 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. 2. Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel’s July 19, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [49]) is ADOPTED. 2 3. Defendants Robert Bender, Thomas Cherro, Jeff Laine, Kevin Dreher, Jason Furey, and Tyler Rosen’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Lance Wickner=s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. [40]) is DENIED. Dated: September 11, 2018 s/Donovan W. Frank DONOVAN W. FRANK United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?