Boldt v. Paulson et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 2], be DENIED AS MOOT; and 2. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 18, 2012. (jam)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Civil No. 12-1500 (JRT/SER)
WILLIAM JOESPH BOLDT,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
LARSON, JOHN AGRIMSON,
and SARA HARD ,
William Joseph Boldt, 139706, 970 Pickett Street North, Bayport, MN 55003,
pro se plaintiff.
The above-captioned case comes before the undersigned on the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections to the Report and Recommendation
were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 2], be DENIED AS
2. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
DATED: October 18, 2012
at Minneapolis, Minnesota
_ s/John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?