Boldt v. Paulson et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 2], be DENIED AS MOOT; and 2. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 18, 2012. (jam)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
________________________________________________________________________
Civil No. 12-1500 (JRT/SER)

WILLIAM JOESPH BOLDT,

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

DAVID PAULSON,NAN
LARSON, JOHN AGRIMSON,
and SARA HARD ,

Defendants.
_______________________________________________________________________
William Joseph Boldt, 139706, 970 Pickett Street North, Bayport, MN 55003,
pro se plaintiff.

The above-captioned case comes before the undersigned on the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections to the Report and Recommendation
were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 2], be DENIED AS
MOOT; and
2. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: October 18, 2012
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

_ s/John R. Tunheim
__
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge