United States of America v. Gunnink et al
Filing
110
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 109 Report and recommendation (Written Opinion). Defendant Douglas J. Gunnink is found in contempt of court until such time Defendant Douglas J. Gunnink purges the contempt by: a. paying the contempt sanction enumerated below; and b. complying with this Courts August 19, 2013 order compelling discovery responses; and Defendant Douglas J. Gunnink Defendant is directed to pay the Clerk of Court $1,317.36 to the Government in reasonable costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/15/14. (KMW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Civil No. 12-1528 (MJD/TNL)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
DOUGLAS GUNNINK, ET AL.
Defendants.
Mark C. Milton, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, P.O. Box
7238, Washington, D.C. 20044, for Plaintiff.
Douglas Gunnink, c/o Benton Hall, 3546 East Presidio Circle, Mesa, AZ 85213,
pro se.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge
Tony N. Leung dated December 12, 2013 (Docket No. 109), along with all the files and
records, and no objections to said Recommendation having been filed, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant Douglas J. Gunnink is found in contempt of court until such
time Defendant Douglas J. Gunnink purges the contempt by:
a.
paying the contempt sanction enumerated below; and
b.
complying with this Court’s August 19, 2013 order compelling
discovery responses; and
1
2.
Defendant Douglas J. Gunnink Defendant is directed to pay the Clerk of
Court $1,317.36 to the Government in reasonable costs and attorney’s fees.
Date: January 15, 2014
s/Michael J. Davis
The Honorable Chief Judge Michael J. Davis
United States District Court Judge
for the District of Minnesota
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?