Regis v. Devi et al

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Devi are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4; Plaintiff 's claims against the Ramsey County District Court are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Additionally, based on the Court's Order dated April 19, 2013, Defendant United States Bankruptcy Court is dismissed as a Defendant to this action. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/4/13. (KMW) CC: Regis. (kt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ricardo Regis,

Civ. No. 12-1673 (MJD/JJK)
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

Roselene Devi et al.
Defendants.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
[Doc. #24] of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated May 3, 2013. No
objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, on all of the files, records,
and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.
IT IS HERERBY ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Devi are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4; and
2.

Plaintiff’s claims against the Ramsey County District Court are DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
3.

Additionally, based on the Court's Order dated April 19, 2013, Defendant United

States Bankruptcy Court is dismissed as a Defendant to this action.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: June 4, 2013

s/Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court