Gregory v. Menard

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 6 Report and Recommendation(Written Opinion). Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis, 2 , is DENIED; This action is SUMMARILY DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); Plaintiff i s required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, namely $291.97, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2); and For purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), this action is dismissed "on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted." cc: Charles Lorenzo Gregory. Modified on 10/26/2012 (lmb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CHARLES LORENZO GREGORY, Civil No. 12-1736 MJD/AJB Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL MENARD, Defendant. Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated September 25, 2012, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket No. 2), is DENIED; 2. This action is SUMMARILY DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); 3. Plaintiff is required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, namely $291.97, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2); and 4. For purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), this action is dismissed “on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted.” DATED: October 26, 2012 s/Michael J. Davis Chief Judge Michael J. Davis U. S. District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?