Craig v. Minneapolis Police Department

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. Plaintiff's motion to be excused from paying an initial partial filing fee, [Doc. No. 5], is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Doc. No. 2], is DE NIED; 3. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, [Doc. No. 3], is DENIED; 4. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915A(b)(1); 5. Plaintiff is required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, nam ely the full $350, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 1915(b)(2); and 6. The dismissal of this action is counted as a "strike" against Plaintiff for purposes of 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g) (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/31/12. (LPH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Shannon Tyrone Craig,

Case No.: 12cv1772 (SRN/SER)
Plaintiff

v.

ORDER

Minneapolis Police Department,
Defendant.
The above-captioned case comes before the undersigned on the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections to the Report
and Recommendation have been filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s motion to be excused from paying an initial partial filing fee, [Doc. No. 5],
is GRANTED;
2.

Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Doc. No. 2], is

DENIED;
3. Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, [Doc. No. 3], is DENIED;
4. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A(b)(1);
5. Plaintiff is required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, namely the full
$350, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(b)(2); and
6. The dismissal of this action is counted as a Astrike@ against Plaintiff for purposes of 28
U.S.C. ' 1915(g).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 31, 2012

s/Susan Richard Nelson
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON
U.S. District Court Judge