Favors v. Fabian et al

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that: 1.Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket Nos. 3 and 12], are DENIED; 2. Plaintiffs "Motion for Copy of Exhibits," [Docket No. 5], and "Motion for C opy of Documents," [Docket No. 8], are DENIED; and 3. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 11, 2012. (jam) CC: Joseph Anthony Favorson 12/11/2012 (MMP).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ________________________________________________________________________ Civil No. 12-2634 (JRT/LIB) JOSEPH ANTHONY FAVORS, Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOAN FABIAN, CAL LUDEMAN, RALPH SCHMIDT, JEFFREY L. PETERSON, DEBORAH J. SCHEDAGG, CHRISTOPHER BORELAND, MARK MEHL, DEBORAH KONIESKA, DEB JAMES, ERIC MELBY, MICHELLE HOOVER, JAMIE JUNGERS, DIANNA MAGAARD, and BETH VIRDEN, Defendants, _______________________________________________________________________ Joseph Anthony Favors, 10098, 1111 Highway 73, Moose Lake, MN 55767, pro se plaintiff. Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois [Docket No.15], along with all the files and records, and no objections to said Recommendation having been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket Nos. 3 and 12], are DENIED; 2. Plaintiff’s “Motion for Copy of Exhibits,” [Docket No. 5], and “Motion for Copy of Documents, “ [Docket No. 8], are DENIED; and 3. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: December 11, 2012 at Minneapolis, Minnesota ___ s/John R. Tunheim _____ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?