Favors v. Fabian et al
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that: 1.Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket Nos. 3 and 12], are DENIED; 2. Plaintiffs "Motion for Copy of Exhibits," [Docket No. 5], and "Motion for C opy of Documents," [Docket No. 8], are DENIED; and 3. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 11, 2012. (jam) CC: Joseph Anthony Favorson 12/11/2012 (MMP).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
________________________________________________________________________
Civil No. 12-2634 (JRT/LIB)
JOSEPH ANTHONY FAVORS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
JOAN FABIAN, CAL LUDEMAN,
RALPH SCHMIDT, JEFFREY L.
PETERSON, DEBORAH J. SCHEDAGG,
CHRISTOPHER BORELAND, MARK
MEHL, DEBORAH KONIESKA, DEB
JAMES, ERIC MELBY, MICHELLE
HOOVER, JAMIE JUNGERS, DIANNA
MAGAARD, and BETH VIRDEN,
Defendants,
_______________________________________________________________________
Joseph Anthony Favors, 10098, 1111 Highway 73, Moose Lake, MN 55767,
pro se plaintiff.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois
[Docket No.15], along with all the files and records, and no objections to said Recommendation
having been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket Nos. 3 and
12], are DENIED;
2. Plaintiff’s “Motion for Copy of Exhibits,” [Docket No. 5], and “Motion for Copy of
Documents, “ [Docket No. 8], are DENIED; and
3. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
DATED: December 11, 2012
at Minneapolis, Minnesota
___ s/John R. Tunheim _____
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?