Snyder v. Astrue

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 9 , is DENIED; 2.Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 15 , is GRANTED; and3.This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/18/13. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civ. No. 12-3104 (MJD/JJK) Jodi Lee Snyder, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated October 10, 2013. Plaintiff has objected to that Report and Recommendation, arguing that Magistrate Judge Keyes, the Commissioner and the ALJ failed to understand the combined effects of Plaintiff’s organic brain disorder, anxiety, depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Plaintiff argues that when these impairments are put into proper perspective, such impairments should be found disabling. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court 1 will adopt the Report and Recommendation, as the Court finds the Commissioner’s decision to deny disability benefits is in compliance with the relevant legal requirements and is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 9), is DENIED; 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15), is GRANTED; and 3. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: November 18, 2013 s/ Michael J. Davis MICHAEL J. DAVIS Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?